Mathematics
Most textbooks hand you ∫ u dv = uv − ∫ v du and say memorise it. It actually comes straight from the product rule — something you already know.
Product rule
You know this already. What if we integrated both sides?
Rearrange
Isolate u·v′ — one term is now a derivative, trivial to integrate.
Integrate both sides
Integrating d/dx[uv] just returns uv.
The formula
Rename v′dx = dv and u′dx = du. That's it — IBP is the product rule, read backwards.
Plot v against u. The curve divides a rectangle into two regions — ∫u dv (left) and ∫v du (below). Together they fill the rectangle uv.
Always: ∫u dv + ∫v du = uv — drag the point to check for yourself
Choose u from the highest category present. The function that is hardest to integrate becomes u — differentiate it away.
Worked example — ∫ x eˣ dx: x is Algebraic, eˣ is Exponential — A before E, so u = x.
∫ ln x dx: write it as ∫ ln x · 1 dx. L comes first, so u = ln x, dv = 1·dx.
∫ eˣ sin x dx can't be finished by IBP in the usual way. Apply it twice — the original integral returns, and you solve for it like an equation.
Don't panic when I reappears on both sides — that's the trick, not a mistake. Solve for I algebraically:
Always add +C. And never switch your u/dv choice between the two applications.
6 questions · Covers everything above.
Question 1
Integration by parts is derived from which differentiation rule?
Question 2
For ∫ x ln x dx, which should be u according to LIATE?
Question 3
You apply IBP to ∫eˣcos x dx and the original integral reappears. You should:
Question 4
What is ∫ ln x dx?
Question 5
To evaluate ∫ x² eˣ dx, you need to apply IBP:
Question 6
Which integral CANNOT be solved by IBP alone?